View Answers

int *x;
39 (86.7%)

int* x;
8 (17.8%)

View Answers

int *x;
23 (51.1%)

int* x;
6 (13.3%)

int &x;
13 (28.9%)

int& x;
6 (13.3%)

A protected abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor deleted my parents, you insensitive clod
29 (64.4%)

View Answers

Just leak. Swap's cheap.
6 (13.3%)

Never write a long-running program, so exit() does the job.
14 (31.1%)

Explicit free in exactly the right set of places.
30 (66.7%)

Pool allocators.
17 (37.8%)

Reference counting and never make a cycle.
11 (24.4%)

A proper garbage collector (e.g. Boehm).
13 (28.9%)

Automatic destructors (e.g. C++)
16 (35.6%)

Heap fragmentation killed my parents, you insensitive clod.
18 (40.0%)